Global Equity Fund

Share Class Investor  
Ticker CAMGX  
Inception Date 11.30.2011
Minimum Investment       $2,500  

2017 Final Capital Gain Distributions

The Cambiar Global Equity Fund is structured as a ‘best ideas’ portfolio, whereby sourcing of new ideas will come from Cambiar’s existing domestic and international portfolios.  

The Fund has the ability to seek investment opportunities from across the globe, making it Cambiar's most diversified portfolio.  

  • Flexibility to invest in all corners of the world.
  • Equal-weighted approach - All new stock positions enter the portfolio at 2% position sizes. This construction is designed to reduce excessive stock-specific risk, while allowing for the freedom to participate on the upside. 
  • Fund will take a broadly neutral weight relative to the U.S. and international exposure found in the benchmark
  • The Fund attempts to hold between 45-55 stocks.

Portfolio Managers

AniaA(2016) 

Ania A. Aldrich, CFA 

    

ToddE(2016) 

Todd L. Edwards, PhD 

    

AlvaroS(2016)

Alvaro Shiraishi

Morningstar Rating™

Performance Charts

The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost and current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns assume reinvestment of all dividend and capital gains distributions. Expense ratio is 2.03% (gross); 1.20% (net). Cambiar Investors, LLC has contractually agreed to reduce fees and reimburse expenses in order to keep net operating expenses from exceeding 0.95% of the average daily net assets of each of the Fund’s share classes until March 1, 2019.  Absent these waivers, total return would be reduced. For performance current to the most recent month-end, please call 1-866-777-8227. The MSCI World Index is an unmanaged index compiled by Morgan Stanley Capital International. The index returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Individuals cannot invest directly in an index.

The Fund charges a 2.00% redemption fee on redemptions of shares held for less than 90 days. 

Portfolio Profile (as of 3.31.2018)

Top 10 Holdings % Weight
Twitter 2.7
AIA Group 2.4
Ambev 2.3
Carlsberg 2.3
Alphabet 2.2
eBay 2.2
AerCap 2.2
Airbus 2.2
BHP Billiton 2.1
Royal Dutch Shell 2.1
% of Total 22.7
Holdings Subject to Change  
Attributes Cambiar MSCI World
Price/Earnings F1Y 14.1 15.4
Price/Book 1.9 2.3
Debt/Equity  1.1 1.2
EPS Growth  12.6 12.7
Market Cap Wtd Avg 82.8 B 136.1 B
Market Cap Median 49.3 B 13.3 B
Active Share 92.4  
Sector Weights   Cambiar      MSCI World
Consumer Discretionary 5.1 12.7
Consumer Staples 12.2 8.7
Energy 9.3 6.1
Financials 19.7 18.0
Health Care 13.1 11.7
Industrials 11.6 11.6
Information Tech 16.3 17.6
Materials 4.1 5.1
Real Estate 1.8 3.0
Telecom Services 2.0 2.6
Utilities 1.8 3.0
Cash 2.9  
Top 5 Countries     Cambiar MSCI World
United States 41.3 59.4
France 12.3 4.0
United Kingdom 10.0 6.0
Netherlands 8.6 1.9
Japan 6.0 9.1
Risk Statistics* Cambiar MSCI World
Alpha -1.0 0.0
Beta 1.0 1.0
R-Squared 80.7 100
Sharpe Ratio 1.0 1.2
Standard Deviation 8.6 8.2
*Five Year    

Commentary

Market Review (3.31.2018)

Global equities posted mild losses during the first quarter of 2018.  While there were no significant drivers behind the pullback in stocks, a lack of new upside catalysts and an increase in market volatility led investors to move to the sidelines.  Talk of protectionist policy between the U.S. and China and the resulting negative impact on trade/global growth was an additional uncertainty that weighed on investor sentiment in the quarter.  Throughout the current bull market, any decline in stocks has generally been a good buying opportunity, as losses were quickly erased and stocks moved on to new highs.  Yet the current environment thus far in 2018 appears more cautious, with loss aversion beginning to outweigh upside potential. 

Given where we are in the business/market/valuation cycle, perhaps a more circumspect posture is appropriate.  While Cambiar still sees varying levels of upside in the equity markets, the Goldilocks environment is behind us and security selection/avoidance decisions will take on increased importance in 2018.  The tightening of monetary policy underway in the U.S. may also spark a rotation in market leadership, as the dramatic outperformance in growth stocks appear poised to give way to their value counterparts.  Higher interest rates are also beginning to offer investors an alternative to stocks, while serving as a potential headwind to companies with no earnings and/or leveraged balance sheets. 

Volatility – A New Paradigm or Return to Trend?

In considering the investment climate of 2018, a look back on market conditions in 2017 is helpful.  Last year was in many ways a near-perfect environment for equity investors: a synchronized global economic expansion, continued low-interest rates, favorable corporate earnings, and generally positive economic and political developments.  Entering 2018, change within the market was bound to occur – and as these somewhat inevitable shifts have emerged, so too has volatility.  We believe the following considerations will play a role in market behavior during 2018 (and beyond).

Positive Real Interest Rate   Monetary policy has been the primary tool to promote the global recovery over the past ten years.  With U.S. inflation levels running at close to 2% and with the economy having achieved full employment, the Federal Reserve is now raising rates back to a positive real number.  Assuming at least two more rate hikes in 2018, the resulting Fed Funds rate in the 2.25% range would be a positive real rate of return for the first time this decade.  As the debt and equity markets have become quite comfortable with an extremely low economic cost of capital, the withdrawal of monetary stimulus is bound to exert pressure on asset prices.  While many have anticipated this eventuality, it would be naïve to believe that this process after such a long duration will be a smooth one.  We believe the rise in interest rates as an explanatory variable for the rise in volatility exceeds most other factors.

Real Interest Rate 2018 (web)

Source: Bloomberg.  Formula: US 3 Month Bill - PCE Deflator. 

 

Quantitative Easing (QE) Programs Outside the U.S. are Reaching Their Limits – QE remains to this day a difficult concept to explain.  While it looks like money printing, it is in fact the simultaneous creation of bank reserves and the removal of risk-free instruments from the financial system.  The objective is to urge financial participants out on the risk spectrum.  In this regard, the QE programs of both Japan and Europe have gone further than the U.S. Federal Reserve.  In Japan, the vast preponderance of positive-yielding debt has been bought by the Bank of Japan (BOJ); the BOJ has subsequently expanded their purchase activity into the corporate debt equity (via ETF) markets.  In Europe, the European Central Bank (ECB) is bumping up against ownership limits for sovereign issues.  The result in both cases is a shortage of risk- free bonds of various durations, an essential source of collateral for interbank liquidity.  The resulting reduction in liquidity makes longer-term currency hedging prohibitively expensive for market participants such as major Japanese and European manufacturers – and thus blunts the benefit of QE.  We believe Europe’s improved economic performance means that the ECB will begin exiting QE in 2018, and raising interest rates back into positive territory in 2019.  Japan’s situation is uniquely complicated and we don’t expect QE to end there in 2018; however, given that the QE program is leading to illiquidity and challenges in basic capital market functions, returns appear to be diminishing. 

Tariffs and Trade Wars? – President Trump has shown a clear willingness to approach negotiations through a confrontational style, including the topic of global trade.  Tariffs on steel and aluminum, and possibly on select Chinese manufactures, likely represent negotiating tactics to force some kind of “deal” or reconciliation.  Even so, for this to be an effective tactic, there would need to be some willingness to implement stiff tariffs in certain categories, just to prove that these are serious threats.  As such, there is some risk that these tariffs “reverse” key stimulative benefits of tax reform and the general economic momentum.  Global trade linkages have become deeply integrated – broadly speaking, it would take a lot of regressive tariffs to rupture these relationships.  At the margin, protectionist policy is not a favorable development.  That said, Chinese IP theft, forced technology transfer, and domestic market protections are difficult to defend as reciprocally reasonable trade policies to tolerate in the long term.  Outside the U.S., the EU has proposed a transaction tax on internet businesses, reasoning that these are disruptive to local economies and tend to channel revenue and profits into the cloud and the most favorable tax jurisdictions.  With locally sourced “profits” difficult to quantify, the EU may tax revenue.  Taken in isolation, these may be reasonable responses to the negative externalities posed by online businesses.  As it happens, these are mostly U.S. companies, and the largest ones in the global stock market, and they may earn less money than would otherwise have been the case.

Market Structure – Global equity market ownership is vastly different from the pre-GFC timeframe.  Index funds, sector ETFs, and quantitative strategies have come to predominant markets, in some cases owning an outright majority of certain stocks and their free floats.  On the other side of the markets, active managers have vastly less firepower to deploy as prices move.  The consequence is that small fluctuations in market flows can lead to outsized stock price moves.  Not unlike the unintended consequences of QE detailed earlier, true stock market and individual stock price liquidity (i.e., the amount of money needed to move a stock price) is lower today than in the past.  

Global Equity Fund

The Cambiar Global Equity Fund trailed the MSCI World Index in the first quarter. The breadth of pullback in stocks was expansive, as eight of ten sectors in the benchmark declined.  Cambiar’s performance lag vs. the benchmark was primarily a function of stock selection, although sector and country allocation decisions also worked against the portfolio in the quarter.  

Trade activity was more muted vs. past quarters, with two purchases and two sales.  The positioning impact to the portfolio was minimal – with no meaningful changes to aggregate portfolio or regional allocations.  Portfolio output on these fronts tend to be a by-product of the investment process, vs. setting country weights and then finding stocks to fill said allocation.  Given the sizable outperformance of U.S. stocks vs. their non-U.S. counterparts in recent years, valuations have subsequently led the Global portfolio to make a larger allocation to Europe and the UK, while underweighting the U.S. 

The most significant negative impact to the portfolio took place in the consumer discretionary sector, where Tata Motors and Adient detracted from returns.  Tata and Adient are auto-related stocks, with Tata being an OEM and Adient a supplier of seats and related parts to the industry.  After a solid 2017, Adient lost ground in 1Q, as the company reduced their income and free cash flow estimates for the year.  The culprit was a combination of margin headwinds via higher input prices, as well as increased investments as part of a joint venture with Boeing.  With respect to Tata, recent earnings were below expectations on weaker margins within the company’s Jaguar lineup; this headwind should abate in the coming quarters with the rollout of new models.  One positive take from the quarter was a return to profitability for the Tata standalone India business.  Although disappointing in the short-term, Cambiar believes the issues facing both of these companies are transitory in nature; that said, their stock prices may be range-bound until the companies can demonstrate progress.

Representing approximately 20% of the portfolio, financials remains the largest sector in the Global Equity Fund.  The sector will subsequently have an outsized impact on performance – which was unfortunately to the downside for the quarter.  The weakness was most evident in the portfolio’s insurance positions, with AXA, MetLife and AIG all posting modest below-benchmark returns.  Cambiar’s constructive outlook for financials is a combination of attractive company-specific fundamentals and an improving interest rate backdrop.  After an extended period of suppressed global interest rates, there is finally a coordinated global effort to normalize monetary policy. 

Cambiar’s stock performance within the materials and industrial sectors were two bright spots for the portfolio in the quarter.  Each of Cambiar’s two materials positions outperformed in the quarter, when the broad sector fell almost 5% in Q1.  Within industrials, Cambiar’s holdings managed to post a small gain, which was considered a victory vs. a negative return for the index.

With respect to positioning, the United States represents the largest country weight within the Global Equity Fund – at 41% as of quarter-end, which is underweight the benchmark weight of close to 60% in the MSCI World Index.  The portfolio has an overweight allocation to Europe, whose equities have trailed the rally in U.S. stocks and thus offer a more attractive risk/reward.  

Looking Ahead

Global equities delivered a dream year for investors in 2017 – strong returns with very low volatility.  As we contemplate the outlook for equities in 2018, two key considerations are global growth and valuations.  The acceleration in economic growth across most geographies is unlikely to sharply decelerate in 2018, providing a continued tailwind to corporate profits and stock prices.  And while valuations in the aggregate are not inexpensive, multiples are not at the euphoric levels that often accompany the end of a bull market. 

The more volatile market environment that appeared in the first quarter may be the ‘new normal’ for investors.  An uptick in volatility is not necessarily a bad thing, as the corresponding increase in dispersion across sectors can be beneficial to active managers such as Cambiar.  Additionally, the increase in market volatility should not be misconstrued for an imminent decline in stocks, as underlying corporate fundamentals and profits – a key driver of stock prices – continue to meet (or exceeded) market expectations.  And while the low yield environment that has been supportive for equity valuations throughout the current cycle is being slowly wound down, rates still remain low on an absolute basis.  Net-net – Cambiar anticipates that the overall upward trend in equities will remain intact; however, investors should prepare for a bumpier ride relative to the past 18 months.

As discussed in our 4Q commentary, Cambiar believes that security selection will take on increased importance in outperforming one’s assigned index in 2018, in contrast to the ‘set it and forget it’ approach that accompanies passive investing.  While advocating active management is an admittedly self-serving recommendation, we are pleased to see that our investment strategies are off to a good start vs. their respective benchmarks – with the bulk of the excess return a function of security selection. 

 

Disclosure

Mutual fund investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. In addition to the normal risks associated with investing, investments in smaller companies typically exhibit higher volatility and international investments may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuation in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.  Emerging markets involved heightened risks related to the same factors as well as increased volatility and lower trading volume.  There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its stated objectives.

To determine if a Fund is an appropriate investment for you, carefully consider the Fund’s investment objectives, risk factors and charges and expenses before investing. This and other information can be found in the Fund’s prospectus which can be obtained by clicking here or calling 1-866-777-8227. Please read it carefully before investing. There is no guarantee that the Funds will meet their stated objectives.

Performance data quotes are past performance and does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost and current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, please call 1-866-777-8227.

Price/Earnings F1Y is a calculation that divides the current share price by the estimates of earnings in the next four quarters. Debt/Equity - Long Term is a calculation that takes interest-bearing, long-term debt divided by shareholder equity. EPS Growth - Long Term is a calculation that takes the company’s estimated profits for five years divided by the outstanding shares. Alpha is a measure of risk-adjusted performance. Beta is a measure of risk in relation to the market or benchmark. The Sharpe Ratio is a direct measure of reward-to-risk and is calculated by subtracting the risk free rate from the rate of return for a portfolio and dividing the result by the standard deviation. Standard Deviation is a statistical measure of historical volatility; a measure of the extent to which numbers are spread around their average. R-Squared measures how closely a portfolio’s performance correlates with the performance of a benchmark index.  These calculations are not a forecast of the Fund’s future performance. 

The Morningstar RatingTM for funds, or "star rating", is calculated for managed products (including mutual funds, variable annuity and variable life subaccounts, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts) with at least a three-year history. Exchange-traded funds and open-ended mutual funds are considered a single population for comparative purposes. It is calculated based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure that accounts for variation in a managed product's monthly excess performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance.  The Morningstar Rating does not include any adjustment for sales loads.  The top 10% of products in each product category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars, and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a managed product is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five-, and 10-year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. The weights are: 100% three-year rating for 36-59 months of total returns, 60% five-year rating/40% three-year rating for 60-119 months of total returns, and 50% 10-year rating/30% five-year rating/20% three-year rating for 120 or more months of total returns. While the 10-year overall star rating formula seems to give the most weight to the 10-year period, the most recent three-year period actually has the greatest impact because it is included in all three rating periods. CAMGX was rated against 717 World Large Stock funds over a three year period and 591 funds over a five-year period. With respect to these World Large Stock funds CAMGX received a rating of 3 stars for the three year and 3 stars for the five year period, respectively. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The MSCI World index is an unmanaged index compiled by Morgan Stanley Capital International. The index returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Individuals cannot invest directly in an Index.  

As of 3.31.2018 the Global Equity Fund had a 1.9% weighting in AIG, 1.5% in Adient, 1.9% in AXA, 0.0% in Boeing, 0.0% in MetLife, 1.5% in Tata Motors.

This material represents the portfolio manager’s opinion and is an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice or a specific recommendation of securities.

Cambiar Funds are distributed by SEI Investments Distribution Co., 1 Freedom Valley Dr Oaks, PA 19456, which is not affiliated with the Advisor. Cambiar Funds are available to US investors only. Strategies included within the Institutional Investor offer are not mutual funds and are not affiliated with SEI Investments Distribution Co.